Explain how men are participating in all the latest attacks, in all wars and in all crimes? How do men run corruption affairs, mafia associations, pharmaceutical lobbies? All failed systems, such as totalitarianism, were allowed by a man. Of course, the text should now be condemned or wounded, but here I am not interested in seeing the sociological and psychological background of this problem.

As far as escape from the myths that even Freud used, as well as psychotherapy, then we come to the myth of Adam and Eve, where Adam or man was then miserable and Eve blamed what he ate the apple. From then on, even today, women are guilty of all. Let’s say for example prostitution, but public houses exist for men, not for women. Women are incapable, but we men are capable of throwing an atomic bomb. We men have destroyed this planet with all possible pollutions, so what about that man? Whether it is labile, narcissistic, and ultimately that its sexuality and need elevate, and compared to the woman’s sexual power, the male is inferior. Most women remain afflicted with love because men can not sexually accept a woman, so they look at it as an object.

A man must be organized into groups. Most men will not go to the woman alone. He has to be with some of the crowd he then exits as a leader to prove to his friends, and sometimes to those from the political party. Usually their Eros are low and they are completely emotionally deprived, and then they put someone at the forefront of the party who has a bigger Eros and then takes the party behind their backs. Such men in the West do not pass, so the instructed party leaders with gentle Eros are set up. Nevertheless, such leaders go only in the Mediterranean and Eastern countries, through the false machismo and the blessing of the official religion where the leader’s mentality is most important.

Those who propagate religious order must know that poverty in these countries is deepest, and then they go to the West. Moreover, the West is guilty of their own poverty, they can not see their shadow of patriarchy, and by rebellion and some emphasis on their quasi-religiosity with a rifle in their hands or the law, as in Turkey, to rule over the masses. So we have a situation in which Norway and Finland are not religious countries that do not propagate love and nonviolence, and the person who needs help or does not have the right to social assistance, housing, education there is the least violence there, while in these ‘male’ patriotic and Religious countries that are keen on morality and love, children have nothing to eat, they have the highest percentage of corruption, crime, and children are sold into slavery. It is not a problem of morality, nor of love nor of violence, but a substitution of the thesis where religion propagates immaterialism 2500 years, and then what they fought the most is materialism, solving problems in those countries for 40 years and what is worst to hear countries are prepared to talk openly about problems until today’s religions and patriarchal nests talk about each other. More for journalists and the public than they want a sincere dialogue.

We can list such examples from South America, Africa, and other macho countries that talk about morals, and in practice as in the Balkan countries with the highest percentage of believers, they are at least religious. According to research, this area is most intolerable. But it is not good to say this in public because in this area people want to show themselves that they are much more open and in fact they do not like other nationalities. Germans and Scandinavians are cold and shriveled, and in fact, they care most about their citizens, and open and warm Balkans, people dig in the canals and live in ethnically clean countries because they are counting on different people. It is this openness that is constantly propagating to us, ‘warm’ and ‘heart’ people from these areas. But the myths about Adam and Eve are deeply rooted in people.

Specifically, it is a pure narcissistic complex. If you do not listen to me, and I offer you a sense of guilt through religion, then you are an infidel and you have to pay for it. What religion speaks about nonviolence is somewhere between rows vanished because I am more important and my status, and you are all in the service of my narcissism. In a modern society, patriarchal associations function through a banking system that lends money to citizens while the bank does not have its own money. It is the biggest absurd that a modern economy does not want to admit, and behind it we have groups of men who are self-proclaimed narcissistic corporal weaknesses in the shadows.

In a psychological sense, the man sees himself through the pack and the nation, the man can not see himself as an individual. Although I have emphasized this first part of the article emotionally critically in order to gain insight into the manipulation we live in, the more important it is for a man to experience his transformation through the acceptance of the woman and Eros. He thus becomes an individual and vice versa. On the other hand, the failure to accept transformation brings us the manipulation mentioned, because male and female in their nature are transient. They exist as long as there are polarizations, and they exist until we develop, until we realize one and the other level of existence in ourselves. Did not Freud say the Super ego (father) and It (mother or Jung what Anima says), Eros and Tantos. Yet this second part of the article is taboo topic. Children do not learn in schools. Kids at school draw circles, read quasi-national literature, solve tasks that have nothing to do with life, because you can not have individuals who handle problems. Children at the end of the school have no idea how to calculate a gross domestic product, how to change a wall outlet, not to say that they know nothing about doing things, and worst, are children who can not think.

This is the image of a manipulative man who has set the wrong criteria in education. Why? So what do we need a smart kid who is not nationalized and creative, who creates an application that then links people to a free economy? What do we need to be educated in evaluating how much we help each other in solving tasks? To put something as a criterion of education is sacrilege. Okay, there’s something simpler. As a criterion, set up programming, psychotherapy, meditation, creating integral groups that function according to their affinities. Saying it publicly and advocating such an opinion, it is plainly stated that Earth is a flat panel.